Lzzrd King, you need a tough skin and a good sense of humor to offer any negative comments on most of the SI threads, which often tend to be packed with cheerleaders. The reason most of us get interested in a thread is because we are bullish on the stock, but I welcome rational contrary opinion. Once you own a stock an inevitable blindness creeps in, and your judgement is blurred.( That is why paper trading teaches very little about the real world of stock ownership) I try to keep reminding myself that I buy stocks not to be "right", but to be rich.
You are right about the limited time span of deepUVL, but by the laws of physics the only eventual replacement is X-Ray, electron beams, or ion beam. All of these have huge inherent problems...x-ray can't be focused, electron beams are puny etc. Deep UVL will be with us for many years, and if Cymer is sucessful they will have the money to develop or buy later technologies. |
