Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Solon who wrote (24913)	11/17/2006 10:48:54 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) of 28931

<"No one said 'coerced'" You said he was COMPELLED to run to the ME. This is not unlike being forced or pressured, so your denial is unconvincing.> My denial that coerced no equal compelled??? Sorry, hardly. One is compelled by ones own issues, one is coerced by another. Sorry. The description is as was intended. <I object to the word "reacting" as a matter of principle.> That's too bad... a nice thought... but people "react" all the time. You and I react all the time. In fact, the usage was exactly as intended as it has the meaning of lack of clear awareness or intention in the "response" that you prefer. We all like to think we are always responding with awareness and intention that is pure... sadly that is not the case. And my opionion that Bush reacted reather than responded (to stay with the verbage we've used so far) is exactly what I intended to say. FWIW, any psychologist will tell you that there is plenty of our action/thought/etc that is reaction and not "aware response". DAK

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next