SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (754721)11/21/2006 1:28:35 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) of 769667
 
Re: "Yes, I mean it... this is my observation of the liberals over the past 5 years..."

I could come around to accepting yoor position ONLY if you can accurately define what you mean.

Without accurate definitions you leave everything *wishy-washy* and impossible to prove any assertion, either way.

For example, you said (& I quote): "liberal[s] ...hate everyone and they partner with the terrorists."

You have to be able to define your terms used, or else the statement has no practical, usable meaning.

So: How do YOU define the term 'liberal'?

(CONCRETE METHODOLOGY, please! No 'rubber yardsticks' that can be stretched to reach any desired point... no evasions like saying 'everybody knows' ['cause, NO, 'everybody' certainly *does not* 'know' what is in you mind...] and --- objectively --- the term has WIDELY DIFFERENT MEANINGS all around the world and all throughout history).

So: YOUR definition, please, so we can know what you are talking about.

SECONDLY: "Hates *everyone*."

(REALLY??????? Be SERIOUS now! That sounds more like a psycho-pathology then a political set of beliefs. Little bit of hyperbole, perhaps?)

THIRDLY: "they have fought against the NSA, and any and all national security steps..."

WHO 'they'? And, seriously, '*all*' national security steps? ALL? (That's just false on it's face... unless your definition of 'liberal' is so narrow and constrictive that you've cut the grouping down to maybe just ONE individual! :-)

"...they want the terrorists to have equal rights as a U.S. citizen,"

Facts not in evidence. Show me someone who wants to extend the rights of American citizens to NON-citizens, and then you can carry on with this claim....

"When they won the recent elections,"

'Liberals' won the election? (That's news to me. I did see a lot of fairly 'conservative' Dems win in purple State areas though... and a lot of liberal spending, deficit-running-up, and often Authoritarian or possibly corrupt incumbents lose though. That doesn't indicate to ME any 'shift towards 'liberalism' though.)

"the terrorist were dancing in the street"

(The only news item saying that that I saw was a totally UNSOURCED one on FOX NEWS, without attribution. So, color me sceptical without proof.... and, anyway --- WHATEVER THE HELL SOME BOZO BUNCH OF THIRD WORLDERS MIGHT GET IN THEIR MINDS TO DO IN THEIR OWN COMMUNITIES IN FRONT OF TV CAMERAS, in *no way* would PROVE your contention that (presumably you meant American) 'liberals' were 'in partnership' with 'terrorists'.)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext