It's like pulling teeth, but a poster on the "other" board had posted that there were PR's that reflected 2 names for the former CEO.
Yawn. Puhleeze. The PRs with both versions of the Wolf story are out there. . . .
Message 23034017
Note that this poster seems to want the reader to believe that everything about the company is a lie and wonders, in the post, what the "Mounties" will do with this.
I'm not defending the actions of the former CEO, but one can see the extent that the basher community will go to spam message boards with negatives posts and then frame conclusions as facts, when there is really no more than speculation or opinion. Opinions from message board posters, including my own, are merely that and no better or worse than any other reader or poster. Note, however, the way bashers post their opinions as clear facts that a scam exists.
After specific requests for clarification and citation,
Message 23034349
there was this response, admitting that there are no PR's with the Wolfe name, but adding the spin that the company is not to be believed because this poster had seen some "posts," whatever that means.
Message 23034666
Note the irony of a poster who posts opinion as fact, which opinion turns out to be a false statement, and which poster wants the reader to believe that the company is lying about everything.
After further query to this poster,
Message 23035144
this poster responded with a statement that he had posted an incorrect statement about the PR's, PR's which do not exist, and which he previously had claimed detailed the use of 2 names by the former CEO.
To: rrufff who wrote (670) 11/22/2006 11:49:47 AM
From: Michal Daniel Read Replies (1) of 680
"Yawn. Puhleeze. The PRs with both versions of the Wolf story are out there."
was an incorrect statement of fact.
There are no PR's with the "Wolf story." If I'm wrong, please correct me as I'm sure you will.
Correct. My unintentional mistake. I should have said "posts" instead of PR's. . . . . |
