Well that may be how islam rationalizes their anti-Western beliefs and actions, but how does it differ from their redundant insistence to exterminate Israel, the Jews, and the U.S.?
You say, "Now, as I noted before, not all western colonies are doomed to end like French Algeria: Israelis have a choice between French Algeria and South Africa." Not much of a choice really; even South Africa -- presumably the lesser of the two evils -- is, and was predictably, an adventure in social chaos and national destruction.
Bottom line, the choice offered non-islamic world civilization is, Convert to islam, or die." Such kind benevolence is touching.
Most Westerners have a difficult time finding anything in today’s islam that makes a positive contribution to human advancement; everything seems to be based upon hate and a desire for world domination. Because other nations have similar behaviors in their past is not a justification for current actions. Intra-sectarian terror and murder says a lot about the inner philosophy of the “peaceful religion”(sic).
Can you respond to my previous question, quoted as follows: "Considering all the obvious negative anti-social aspects of islam, can you suggest a few, generally acceptable positive, civilized contributions motivating them (islamists) beyond simply world-domination at any cost?" |
