I'd like to also point out that the "other board" has spent perhaps scores of posts on a topic where an attorney who resigned the bar, rather than be suspended, made what seems to be a claim that Petar V had scammed here.
The other board spent a lot of time and money, getting transcripts of hearings, and even getting that former lawyer, or someone claiming to be her, to post.
I analyzed and gave my opinion at first. I was criticized. After much ado and claims that seemed to prove Petar guilty of scamming beyond a reasonable doubt, it now appears that my own opinions, formed without benefit of anything other than what the claimed victim posted, pretty much is where the "negative posters" are with this alleged fraud.
There is no proof whatsoever and hardly even allegations that Petar committed any fraud or criminal act. One particular poster is now posting "longshot" theories of scam and fraud, in an attempt to claim that Petar is a criminal. (My opinion there about the post.) This same poster was a vehement defender of Anthony@Pacific who is now serving another decade perhaps for crimes involving stock manipulation as a short seller.
I raise this not to say that people should not do DD. If Petar is a crook, we all want to know. However, be wary of those who would cast stones and claim their opinions are facts.
These people will do the "throw manure and see what will stick" routine. One has to merely read that board and see the "scam of the day" theory.
Today, we have reports from IHub posters that actually visited the management and the premises. Of course, this will upset those who want to claim that everything is a lie and that nothing should be believed (except, of course, what they post.) |
