SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 240.86-5.9%2:02 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: j3pflynn who wrote (218888)12/5/2006 1:13:42 PM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (1) of 275872
 
Paul, my mistake earlier-- the 147mm^2 listed must've been for an old 939 512 x 2 part.

So, 183mm^2 for 90nm AM2 512K x 2

And 12x for 65nm:

Let's see:

120/183 = .66
125/183 = .68
129/183 = .70

That's not that good at all, if true-- should've been something like a factor of .58

Is this really "65nm"? Or is it more like "70nm"? Something isn't shrinking as one would expect.

Again, all based on this Inq data being correct.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News