10-Bagger MINIMUM Rise from July 1, 2005 until December 31, Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : 10-Bagger MINIMUM Rise from July 1, 2005 until December 31,

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: inchingup who wrote (1540)	12/6/2006 1:17:14 PM
From: rrufff	of 1694

You mis-stated my post. You used a silly surface ratio of PE to claim that it was overvalued. I turned the tables on you and used another silly surface ratio price to revenue to show that it is undervalued. Those are the games that the moronic generic basher plays and I just want everyone to understand that. My post states - look at the business and analyze it in depth. Then come back and tell us it is overvalued in its market place. Your post, which I attacked, is purely moronic generic bash, no in-depth analysis. Just one saying that this pinkie, in the process of developing a higher business base (top and bottom line at a rapid pace) currently has low earnings and that this does not justify the price. It's an absurd argument, in my opinion. You're entitled to your opinion though and you've made it in your own way. As for time frame, very few of the stocks mentioned have fulfilled promise during the time frame. Some have done better and then come back. (SLJB was as much as a 100 bagger and now "only" about a 10 bagger.) I think the readers here are looking for stocks that will do well in the future. I believe that LBWR is one that reward from here. The fact that it has disappointed some is a historical issue and of little value. I bought almost all my shares from .08-.10. It has not moved as quickly as I'd hoped but I'm willing to stick with it. Many or most here probably feel the same way and trade on the periphery of their positions to lower costs and accumulate more on dips. Most here understand that the low net income was expected and that's why the stock has not tanked significantly below the .10 level. I think we've explored this enough though. I think we both understand what the other is saying.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next