LOL...OK, I will embarass you if you are so intent on being embarassed. Is that what you want...for me to prove that what you think you know as FACT is NOT FACT??? I assume since you claim to know something as fact, which in 2 minutes or less you can see is NOT fact, then we best be real careful anytime you claim anything to be factual...huh???
Creede, in less then 1 minute you will see that it is NOT a TOS VIOLATION to post a PM. It is a TOS violation on IHUB to post somebody elses PM, BUT NOT ON SI!!!!
Yet you claim it is a FACT that posting a pm ( by the way, I could have posted all PM's in full, but all I did was pull some snippets...didnt even post the whole PM!!!, ALTHOUGH I COULD!!) is a TOS Violation and I better ask dave to remove it??
LMAO.....I guess we now know that you really have no clue what you are talking about and you have no problem claiming something to be factual or true, even though a third grader could take 1 or 2 minutes, read the TOS and see it is NOT a TOS violation.
So, is this how you operate? You claim things to be factual when 1 minute of DD shows whatever you claim is NOT factual??
Pretty Lame Creede....Will we soon see you on the basher board where their favorite hobby is 'claiming things to be factual' when they are not?
<<You do realize you are in violation of the TOS >>
You are 100% DEAD WRONG!! How many other times have you been wrong?? That is not a pretty scorecard you have...an awful lot of FACTS that turn out to NOT be facts..an awful lot of This is a cant miss pick, only to see you claim you were duped by the company or ceo...and it is a LONG list of companies you claimed were cant miss that you after the fact say you were duped!!! But what should we expect if you can claim something is a TOS violation, when 1 minute of DD wopuld show you you are 100% wrong......
Here is a PM from DAVE HIMSELF who clearly says it is NOT a TOS violation to post anothers PM!!!!!!
<<To: im a survivor (who wrote) 9/15/2006 2:49:04 PM
From: SI Admin (Dave)
You could change the basher / pumper labels and it would make no difference. Persons on each "side" are equally responsible. Present company included.
There is no prohibition on SI about posting PM unless the contents of the PM are themselves a TOU violation. vulgarity, personal attacks, privacy violation, etc.
It doesn't prove anything, however. Who is to say if it is a bona fide copy/paste of a PM? >>
Creede, in the future please verify what you state prior to claiming it as fact!!! |
