Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Taro who wrote (314851)	12/10/2006 8:35:52 AM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) of 1572466

"Those are facts, my friend. " No they aren't. Nowhere has anyone suggested that temp. changes lag CO2 concentrations by 800 years. Except for you. I'd like you to propose a mechanism for that one. "Still, however, your GW "expert" tried to come up with a construction ad absurdum about how CO2 still caused the warming thus demonstrated. I just pointed out the obvious consequences, should his BS be taken seriously." No, you've made up something entirely new. His rationale is pretty simple. You have some warming, followed by some melting to make a carbon sink available to the atmosphere. Likely warming of permafrost. Followed by a build up of CO2 and further warming. "I claim nothing and rest observing those curves, where the warming comes first and the CO2 follows." In a natural system, that might be the usual case, ignoring times of heavy volcanic activity. But what about a case where an additional 10^13 tons of CO2 is being added to the system per year? There isn't an example of that in the geological record. Again, does CO2 absorb in the infrared? Your conclusions are predicated on it not.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next