SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kevin Rose who wrote (5426)12/11/2006 11:02:21 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 10087
 
Whether or not Iraq was necessary, or even a good idea, it was certainly an attempt to "prepare the soil".

maybe it was necessary for the Iraq people to get rid of him, just as we got rid of the redcoats.

I think he was pretty secure in power. Maybe they would have gotten rid of one of his successors eventually, or maybe eventually his successors wouldn't have been as bad (although his sons seemed pretty bad and they where possible successors).

One of the myths is that the colonists rose up with their weapons to defeat the redcoats, but the reality was that most didn't have rifles, only small game guns, and had to be equipt.

Its not really a myth. Early on a lot of the colonists where using their own weapons, and later the militia often did.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext