Value Investing Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: pcyhuang who wrote (25550)	12/17/2006 12:02:28 PM
From: Paul Senior	Read Replies (2) of 78732

pcyhuang: For CWTR to grow 20x from here would mean its market cap goes from a little over $2B to over $40B. That would dwarf the combined (current) market cap of AEOS+LIZ+ANF+etc. IF CWTR business continues as a retailer/seller of clothing, the only way its market cap can get to $40B in the next six years imo is if there's some sort of hyperinflation. As I read the MF article, the author and head Fool, does not state he owns shares of CWTR or has ever owned shares of CWTR. Nor is he recommending CWTR as a buy now. Not as a value buy nor as a growth story. So I believe it's a legitimate question for me to wonder as moderator, why is the article being dropped into this thread without any explanation? Could it be to discuss the pro's and con's of MF articles or to discuss issues surrounding getting 20 baggers? To discuss CTWR as a value investment? Now that I understand you are posting on CWTR as a value investment and that some other people here seem to be interested in the company/stock, I have a question for you: I notice that when you mention stocks here as "contrary alerts" and now too with CWTR, you never, afaik, actually say you are buying or have bought these stocks. Are you a recent buyer of CWTR?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next