Foreign Policy Discussion Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: DayTraderKidd who wrote (7793)	12/19/2006 12:36:36 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) of 15987

The UNSC DID issue binding resolutions against Iraq. It is important to maintain credibility and I believe that is exactly why the UN didn't enforce the resolution (not to mention they are as currupt as most organizations). Oh? They declare Saddam in material breach of UNSC 687 (the ceasefire accord), yet are unwilling to enforce it. And that's supposed to create "credibility"? The world isnt nearly as black and white and you would like to paint it. The world is NEVER "black and white" to people like yourself when you are looking for an excuse to avoid enforcing all of your fancy rhetoric. If the resolutions were never intended to be enforced, they should never have been issued. Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next