SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Peter Dierks who wrote (15659)12/19/2006 4:19:29 PM
From: E. T.  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
You make me curious when you say I "seem blissfully unaware of the truth on WMDs."

Please, there are no WMDs, particularly none to the extent Cheney and Bush led us to believe there were. None that were "imminently threatening" America. No "slam dunk"ers. Now Bush falls back on the notion that Iraq had some sort of capability to make them if the need arose. From what I've read, Saddam tried to give the impression that he had WMDs to keep his populace fearful of his wrath. But the nuke making and WMD making ability was over sometime around 1991. And tell me this. Why was Cheney and Rumsfeld talking of going to war on the day mostly Saudis and Osama bin Laden attacked America. That tells me the Bush administration was predisposed to go to war with Iraq, the evidence be damned. Iraq did not attack America. Now we've given Iraq 9/11 on a weekly basis. They must love us.

But you tell me, "the rest of the story." The part I'm missing.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News