American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (15683)	12/20/2006 4:44:17 AM
From: E. T.	Read Replies (2) of 71588

I'll read what you've posted. But what you don't read is that analysts and CIA-types that questioned the data supporting the existance of WMDs, saying this is all supposition, "we have no hard information that proves Saddam has WMDs," were sacked or saw their careers derailed. The White House wanted to go to war with Iraq, it was predisposed to go to war with Iraq. Rumsfeld and Cheney were not interested in considering analysis suggesting there no WMDs. The two men shielded the president from this information. It was "slam dunk" all the way. This is what I decided by reading many sources and reading a few books on the war. But I'll give the links you sent me a look see and we can talk more then.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next