Did a search to see if anyone else on SI picked up on this as majorly important and mindbending photo in photographic history.
r-c-g you are the only
person on SI that brought attention to this other than myself
It is times like this i sense the basic shallowness of most all on SI and iHub.
i doubt very much that more than 5% on these threads give a bloody damn about this first confirmation of "dark matter" (i prefer, "missing mass" or "the otherness":).
My original post on this was on iHub( my handle there "otraque")
**************************************************
<<Posted by: otraque
In reply to: otraque who wrote msg# 1213 Date:8/23/2006 8:05:10 PM
Post #of 1599
Astronomers: 'Dark matter' exists
Tuesday 22 August 2006, 5:39 Makka Time, 2:39 GMT
english.aljazeera.net
"Dark matter" is invisible
Astronomers have said they have found the best evidence to date of "dark matter" the mysterious invisible substance that is believed to account for the bulk of the universe's mass.
Using a host of telescopes, researchers focused on the collision between two galactic clusters. They found that most of the gravitational pull from the aftermath of the encounter comes from a relatively empty looking patch of sky, a strong suggestion that there is something more there than meets the eye.
Doug Clowe, a research astronomer at the University of Arizona, said: "This provides the first direct proof that dark matter must exist."
His colleagues used NASA's Chandra X-ray observatory, the Hubble Space Telescope and several ground-based observatories to examine the "bullet cluster", a clump of galaxies that formed over the last 100million years from the violent collision of two smaller galactic clusters. The object gets its name from a bullet-shaped cloud of super hot gas on one of its sides.
Bullet cluster
Most of the visible mass in the bullet cluster is concentrated in that cloud and another near it. But using a technique known as gravitational lensing, Clowe and his colleagues show that the force of gravity is actually stronger in a part of the cluster that appears to be emptier.
They will publish their results in a future issue of Astrophysical Journal Letters.
Sean Carroll, a university of Chicago physicist, said: "This is really exciting", adding that the observations demonstrate the existence of dark matter "beyond a reasonable doubt". (edit: i remind "dark matter" is a term that now should be understood as that which simply can not be seen, and has no proven explanation. max:)
Astronomers have used dark matter for 70 years to explain various observations about the universe's behaviour. They have shown that rotating spiral galaxies would fly apart if it were not for the gravitational pull of undetectable matter in addition to their stars.
Other observations show that the expansion of the universe is being held back by a force greater than the gravitational pull of visible matter alone.
Alternative theories
Though dark matter clearly provides the best explanation for such observations, Clowe said, "astronomers have long been in the slightly embarrassing position" of having to appeal to some mysterious, unobservable material in order to make things fit together.
Some physicists have even proposed that it is not the amount and type of matter in the universe that needs to be adjusted, it is the law of gravity itself. They have suggested alternative theories that boost the strength of gravity on galactic and intergalactic scales in order to do away with the need for dark matter.
Carroll said: "It's always possible that there's some modification of gravity going on as well.
"No matter what you do you're going to have dark matter."(edit: again i wish they would just kill that 70 year old term, and stick with the one that is being used more and by others, and that is simply " the missing mass" that it does not emanate a light that interacts with the stuff we are made and in that sense only is it "dark"--as in we can NOT see it--wild say what??:)max)>>
AP >>
|
