Thompkins - please do not misrepresent my posts. I stated my opinion of value IF the company can prove it is not a scam. You don't like my opinion and, as the expression goes, everyone has one. You have your own arbitrary opinion.
Again, I'm not claiming that the company is NOT a scam or defending what the company has done. I've been very critical of management.
Where we differ is whether or not the company is priced as a scam and, if they show they are not a scam, where the price will go. You misrepresent my posts, but that seems typical of what you do. I wasn't bragging about my 100 baggers, merely trying to teach you how the pink sheet market works. You seem to be a bit inexperienced and want to limit yourself to valuations that buyers use in non-public markets. Clearly, that makes no sense.
You also misrepresent my post with reference to reasons why the stock is at its current extremely low price. Yes, I agree that the company is priced where it is because of its failure to perform as promised. Again, as you seem to be having problems with basic reading comprehension, this is why the company is priced as a scam. I am not blaming bashers. I only stated the facts. There is a higher percentage of bashers on every board, including those who have multiple aliases.
I've expressed my opinion that IF THE COMPANY IS PROVEN NOT TO BE A SCAM, IT MAY BE VALUED BY INVESTORS USING A PRICE TO REVENUE MULTIPLE THAT COULD ARGUABLY GIVE THE COMPANY A SHARE PRICE OF .08. For your better understanding, I am not saying that this will happen. As the company is priced as a scam, it is priced at a fraction of what it would be priced if it were proven not to be a scam.
This is very elementary logic. Let's recognize that your opinion of .001 is quite arbitrary and shared by a similar styled blogging professional. The market says what it says. You seem to be saying that you know more than the market. Yet, I've shown in the previous posts that your inexperience in these markets keeps you using formulae that are more appropriate in non-public markets.
I'm going to consider this conversation at an end. You refuse, after being asked many times, to give your previous ID's here. You lie about my posts. You want your opinion to be the one that counts. Clearly, you have an agenda. |
