Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LLCF who wrote (25117)	12/27/2006 5:14:42 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) of 28931

"So before we go there... is that teaching original or not???" NONE of his "teachings" are original. That is a FACT. Which does your word "that" refer to?? Give me the "quote" and I will quote our historical documents proving the teaching existed before. "unless you are the 'great Solon'... then you just make up your own apparently." Your puerile insults simply niggle the discussion. I have not made anything up, as you are too too aware. I've asked you to disprove (if you are able) that any single claim of the mythologised Jesus was an UNoriginal teaching. You have failed to do so. Case closed! "The difference is I simply say "I don't know" based on all that, and you say "I know he didn't exist!"" Let me correct your misunderstanding. There may well have been a composite "Jesus". There was not a biblical Jesus, however. Evidence shows this to be impossible. This composite Jesus exists only in myth--nowhere in history. "NOT producing the mouse doesn't prove there are none. 8th grade, as I said." It proves that such an assertion is baseless and has no evidentiary support--DUH! In logic, any ONE instance is sufficient to invalidate a factual claim. You have not been able to give even ONE instance to disprove the FACT that no saying of Jesus was original. Nor can you produce even ONE mouse speaking low German--which is of the same order of difficulty. Good luck! Remember, this discussion was about your claim that my assertion (that Jesus taught nothing original) was not a supportable assertion. You have made the contrary claim--and you have billowed out your shallow chest--but your argument is a strict silence. Why am I not surprised?!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next