Your post rang some bells with many of us here, Euterpe. And probably many of us understand the difference between supporting the war, and believing it might have been better planned, and possibly not undertaken at all.
In my case, I do think it was necessary, as we had over 17 UN Resolutions, had continued to let Saddam do whatever he dang well felt like doing, including murder tens of thousands of his own people with WMD, paying $25,000 or more to a family who provided a child who would blow him/herself up in a crowd, and all the other things we are beginning to know.
We have spent Billions over the years for the Pentagon to do necessary War planning. During the 1990's, as you know, the Military, and the CIA budgets were cut quite harshly. We don't yet know how all of that changed what happened. The Pentagon should have had much better planning, and should have had it on line in case we needed it, the very day we needed it. Obviously, we need to look at what Congress has been doing in the Committees who were supposed to be overseeing the various departments of the DOD and also the State Department.
Especially auditing the Departments where there had been continuous, and not just the new political newcommers, but continuous employees who have been charged with the plans in the first place.
I think we did win the war. Saddam fell. His evil sons were killed. In the largest parts of Iraq, life is better, if you read any of the blogs from there. The Triangle is another matter, including most of Baghdad.
I don't think any of us thought it would take so long to help the Iraqi's win the peace.
Maybe we will find that we need Soldiers to do what they are trained to do. And we may need an entirely new group of people to train citizens of the newly freed country to keep their own peace.
There are only 9 (or did I hear 7 today) embedded journalists in Iraq today, versus over 5,000 after the war started. How do we know what we are getting is any good at all, unless the people are actually there?
Remember Eason Jordan, News Head for ALL of CNN.. ...who finally admitted to the world that they ---CNN --- had NOT told the true story of what was happening in Saddams' Iraq because of his fear of reprisal to his news team in Baghdad....?
He and CNN made the decision NOT to tell us how back it was under Saddam.
Most of us have read and appreciated your comments, on the war and on other things. Me included .... I do think that most people who post here on PfP do appreciate our troops and are grateful for their efforts and sacrifices.
I still have yet to hear a single, believable reason from anyone who is antianythingBushdoes....as to why they think he would do anything that would impact his legacy as President.
Think of it.....why would ANYONE do that? Any American President? Even misguided Carter thought he might be doing something right...I guess. He certainly has sent messages to oru country and to the troops that indicates he doesn't support their efforts....(check out Jimmy Carter quotes Iraq) on google.... But I'm thinking that senility has been working overtime there, and that the MSM is afraid to say the prince is running amuck again.
I think the biggest thing we can all do now is think what we will do when the next attack comes..........and no doubt it will.
How many times can we spend thousands of lives like in 9-11 or worse, spend BILLIONS of dollars trying to repair the damage to our cities, and our economy, and all the survivors of the people who were killed.
We gave a slap on the hand the first WTC I. Several other events and murders on a mass scale happened to US citizens after that. Then 9-11.
What will happen next time? Another 17 or 25 UN Resolutions.... and another bunch of words telling those bad guys to stop?
Or do what FDR did the day after Dec 7th? |
