| | AH - Michal - where is the advice?
In your frustrated attempt to lie about my posts and in your very typical style, in which you add nothing to the discussion by the other sheeple, you cite a post that states the stock went up after it was heavily bashed.
Nowhere in the post is there any investment "advice," other than to make one's own decision and not to listen to internet distortion.
You are plain and simply lying about my post and about other posts. It's real hard isn't it Michal Daniel.
The post was true then and it's true now. We've seen posters, posting around the clock, not about the stock, but about me, in violation of TOU and warnings from Dave. I responded to each and every post and showed that they, and you, are lying about my posts. But, all the posts are in violation of what SI DAVE posted.
Paragraph 1 - is true The stock hit .14 x .145. For those who bought in the .002's, this was a 75 bagger. The stock went even higher than that. All during the 100 bagger run, the stock was heavily bashed by you and by your bash peers. Anyone who followed your advice lost money.
Paragraph 2 and 3 - reference to the worm, who has lied about my posts. He's been booted from SI and IHub. If you want his aliasses, I'll list them. Please let me know. All true then and true now.
Yes, the stock is down now and I have been wrong, as I've acknolwedged, in my opinions. You are almost as hypocritical as Jeffrey S. Mitchell. You pissed, whined and moaned because you did not have freedom of posting. You were banned. You indicate this is why you waste your time on a stock that you don't know, posting very little substance, attacking other posters. Yet, hypocritically, your attacks are to cite posts which are factual and then to lie about them and claim that they are somehow "advice."
My only "advice" is to ignore mis-statements and to make one's own decisions. In the cited post, the stock had been heavily bashed and the stock went up. I didn't state to buy, to refrain from selling. The post was a comment as to the misrepresentation that is found posted by those such as you. SHOW ME WHERE I ADVISED ANY BUYING OF SLJB IN OTHER THAN EXTREMELY SPECULATIVE, HIGH-RISK ACOUNTS. I get many PM's and, even in those, I warn people to avoid these type of stocks unless they are prepared to take the high risk, high return, gamble, as part of a very diversified portfolio.
You and your bash sheeple, former disciples of now defrocked and disgraced gurus, have all proven my point. Attack the stock. Add substance to what there is. Don't lie about my posts. I've already posted my own opinion that the Ontario complaint is true and that the company has P&D'd. I wish I had known this when the stock was at .14. I was wrong. I'm brave enough to admit when I'm wrong. You, cowardly, attack with old posts, even though you have a universe of information that shows the company is a scam. Typical cowardly Michal Daniel tactics. You're not even original, you parrot the lead sheeple.
But, I will never admit that I urged anyone to buy anything in the speculative penny and sub-penny stock area with anything other than gambling type money and as I do, as part of an extremely diversified portfolio.
2006 was by far my best year ever. Despite very large losses from the top because I did not sell all my stock, 100 bagger runs in HISC and LFWK, just 2 stocks out of about 100 that I actively trade, gave me 6 figure gains net on a very diversified portfolio.
I'm not bragging. You and your fellow personal attackers, although pretending to ignore my posts **you've admitted that many times **, read every single post. The best you can come up with is posts that are opinions, that comment on misrepresentations by bashers, all of which are true, and where my own opinion on what the management was doing turned out to be wrong.
If we are to be afraid to post for fear of being wrong, then I suggest that SI will become a desolate place, with back slappers such as yourself posting about photography or some other non-financial topic.
You are a hypocrite. |
|
