2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 379.91

+0.4%

Nov 11 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TobagoJack who wrote (13192)	1/1/2007 10:57:35 AM
From: Metacomet	Read Replies (3) of 217694

bush and co, however moronic, is correct in determining that there is a war on, and the 911 raid brought same realization to all. the war has been on for some time, Exactly what war is that? And is the US necessarily a combatant even if there is? 9-11 was not an act of war. It was not state sponsored, and should have resulted in a major focused police action against the individuals responsible. A Police action conducted by our armed forces, against militant foreign based gangs. Had the actual perpetrators been our targets in an intense focused, search and capture action, the nations action would have been justified. We are the protagonists in this war because we are warring on nations that were no threat to us militarily, and were not even involved with 9-11. The only way that Bush is correct that there is a war on is because he is unilaterally conducting one.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next