SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: marcos who wrote (28701)1/3/2007 11:38:33 AM
From: tyc:>  Read Replies (1) of 78416
 
>>look at the epm.wt.b that i like very much

ok I did ! But here's why I prefer my RNG.wts.

You hit the nail on the head when you said that out-of-the- money warrants provide better leverage. IMHO, leverage is the only reason for buying warrants.

EPM.wt.b has a strike price of $1.50. With the warrant at .42c and the stock @ $1, the model I use says that the warrant will move 58% of the movement of the stock; if the stock moves up .20c, the warrant will move .115c.

The stock price of $1 is only 2.4x the warrant price, and 58% of that is only 1.3x. That is poor leverage; one might as well hold the stock . RNG.wts have much better leverage.

( Of course none of this has any bearing on the quality of EPM as an investment. Simply saying the leverage offered by the warrant is not attractive to me.)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext