Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ilaine who wrote (211909)	1/6/2007 3:11:45 PM
From: SARMAN	Read Replies (2) of 281500

No one is unhappy to see Saddam go, however, how could those overpaid fat cat in Washington missed the consequence of removing Saddam from power? Bush father knew the consequence of removing Saddam and left him there. Not only he left him there but gave him the OK to attack the South's Shiits to maintain control over the country. Same with Clinton. Let us not forget that the CIA propped Saddam regime since its inception. Today the US government is propping Maliki's government and is failing miserably. While Saddam was in power there were social, financial and security stability. The price for that stability was that you could not criticize the ruling party. Compare to what you have today, Saddam ruling was a blessing. The blindness of the Bush's administration, is taking the ME to a new heights of uncertainty, which in turn creates pressure on Israel and Israel's goons put pressure on the Bush's administration and Bush makes more mistakes. Saddam will not be back and Iraq will not be peaceful again.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next