Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (319576)	1/9/2007 8:49:52 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) of 1575441

The statement below......one that you made in your post to me........reflects that attitude: "Yes they are getting richer faster. But as long as every group is getting richer that's hardly a major problem." Neither that statement, not to my knowledge any other statement I have made in any context, reflects, implies, supports, accepts, or argues for a "let them eat cake" attitude. That may not be your intent but that's the consequence of the position you are taking. Its not okay that the rich are getting richer 3, 4 or 5 times faster than the poor for all sorts of reasons. The fact that you ignore those reasons and continue to maintain your stance clearly gives others the impression you could give a damn........and I think that is very true. By your own omission, the lowest quintile is not even mentioned by Reynolds/Henderson False. "By your own omission" doesn't make a lot of sense. I assume you mean "by your own admission". If that's what you mean, I make no such "admission" mainly because there is nothing to admit. It isn't true. Sorry. By your own admission, the lowest quintile was ignored by Reynolds/Henderson.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next