SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 171.02-1.5%3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JeffreyHF who wrote (147595)1/12/2007 9:15:41 AM
From: Stan  Read Replies (1) of 152472
 
Jef, I've been in enough jury trials to know that jurors look for easy explanations to complicated issues. They are no experts and the subject matter in a case like this is overwhelming. Carranza's point is more likely. Defense will hammer this inconsistency home at every point. The thought that he has changed his mind in the past year will be meaningless to the jury since he will look like he's been bought by Q. I can only hope that the second patent in question in the trial will have a chance of obtaining a one for one split by the jury.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News