Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 174.81

0.0%

Dec 26 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JeffreyHF who wrote (147611)	1/12/2007 10:58:24 AM
From: matherandlowell	Read Replies (1) of 152472

"only incompetence could explain Qualcomm being unaware of their expert`s writings on point" Surely Dr. Lee will have an opportunity to reconcile his thoughts in front of the jury: he seems to be saying that the BRCM uses the method described in the QCOM patent but there is some "fundamental" difference between some aspect of the QCOM method and some aspect of the standard. It might be that the standard uses QCOM's patents for part of the task but adds and combines other methods for other parts. Q's property has still been crossed; the company still has to be compensated. I should say that that I once served jury duty and that I have made several appearances in traffic court, all to no avail. I'm sure you guys were wondering. j.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next