<I have no idea whether it's true that women are less intelligent than men because they have smaller brains, on average.>
I doubt it's because of that. My guess is that it's because of earlier puberty, therefore earlier brain growth completion. But 2.4 IQ points is not far above noise and personality traits [such as being more civil, less competitive] would drown that in any normal environment.
It's not really sexist to say there are differences between the sexes. Denying, for example, that men have a Y chromosome and women don't, is not really sexist. Nor that men have more testosterone [on average]. Etc. There are many factual sex differences. Neither is it sexist to point out the intellectual differences, such as earlier puberty, which has a very practical educational effect = females had better, usually, get their education younger or they'll miss out. But so had early maturing boys. Learning things AFTER puberty, such as language, is always more difficult. Watch a 2 year old learn language and it's amazing. Watch a 23 year old, and they struggle for years to get an accent-free speech, which they can't do [I don't think I've come across such a person].
There will be foreign affairs effects with women running the USA, which seems increasingly likely [the natural state of politics is for women to run it when wars and exploration are irrelevant]. I think women will be less inclined to invasions, though I hear women can be quite bitchy to each other, forming dominance hierarchies quite enthusiastically.
Women ruling USA and unmarried little emperors running China. That should be fun.
Mqurice |
