Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: geode00 who wrote (213066)	1/15/2007 2:25:06 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) of 281500

I suppose it's on topic, since politicians around the world are climbing on the greenhouse effect cult bandwagon and are planning all sorts of actions to counteract it. It's an excellent problem for them to solve since there isn't actually a problem and it has avoided the glaciation problem which would be a REAL problem. Imagine having highway tunnels under kilometres of ice between Hamburg and London. The Eurotunnel would be good! <If we had been burning fossil fuels for a century before that, who knows what we'd be living through now. > It would be great because the world would be much more developed and I wouldn't have to have lived through industrial revolution technological poverty. I would now be swishing around in super duper little self-navigating personal transports at negligible cost and in complete safety and comfort at high speed. Mobile cyberspace would be a gigabit per second corpus callosum direct to a vast brain so my little node would feed in and get information out at negligible cost. Etc. With average temperature increase of 0.7 deg C, I think you are believing something that's not true in regard to the huge climate change in Washington DC, New Jersey and Britain. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next