SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ron who wrote (9001)1/16/2007 11:52:53 PM
From: Triffin  Read Replies (2) of 36917
 

I'll hold off on that ocean front property for now. But you go ahead

Prolly good advice in case of an Atlantic tsunami;
but it won't be from melting the Greenland Ice Cap ..

Here's the relevant data from Wiki ..
en.wikipedia.org

From my prior post I had ..
630,000 cu miles ice volume or 2,625,900 cu kms
from the link above we get
683,000 cu miles ice volume or 2,850,000 cu kms

also the following melt rates ..

1996 96 cu kms
2005 220 cu kms
2006 239 cu kms


The 2005-2006 melting growth rate is 1.0863636%

So, if we start in 2005 with an ice sheet
volume of 2,850,000 cubic kms , that had a
net melt of 220 cubic kms and compound that
melt rate thru 2034 @ 1.0863636% per year;
we melt a total of 28,007 cubic kms over that
period of time or less than 1% of the
total ice volume .. also, @ 239 cu kms per year
net melt .. It'll take oh .. 12,000 years to melt
the Greenland Ice Cap ..

I think I'll go back to worrying about the
ramifications of Peak Oil, cause GW induced
sea level rise just ain't happening in any time
frame we humans will have to worry about .. at least
not for several more generations ..

Triff ..
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext