I'm not sure we can be all that certain about the conditions. If calculations about something as...hard, and ascertainable, as WMD could be wrong, then (imo) just about anything could be.
It hard to imagine how you could put those two in the same category. WMD estimates were based solely on gossip and theoretical computations. For example there was gossip that there was a mobile weapons lab that could produce x quantities of weapon material. There was never a mobile weapons lab to begin with.
UNICEF used a sampling technique of Iraqi households.
Since the sanctions had so many loop holes for humanitarian relief and aid, they didn't have that much direct impact (imo)
The measure wasn't loop holes the measure was how many children were identified as suffering from malnutrition. By relaxing the sanctions the malnutrition rate in Iraq was reduced, that was verified by going to households.
Both sides used the 50,000 per year argument. Either it was Saddam's fault or it was the fault of the sanctions. And while each side argued over whose fault it was, the children died [or will suffer long term effects] of being severe malnutrition.
The "Cause of Death" on a death cert isn't listed as "Saddam", "The US", "The Sanctions" or even severe malnutrition. It's going to be whatever the complications were that resulted from severe malnutrition.
For whatever reason, no one seems to care anymore about the argument as it might exist today. Perhaps because we can't blame Saddam or the sanctions.
"Iraqi children suffering alarming malnutrition - UNICEF
by Corp Roters Monday, May. 15, 2006 at 8:45 PM
"Under-nutrition should not be accepted in a country like Iraq, with its wealth of resources..." Malnutrition among Iraqi children has reached alarming levels, according to a UNICEF survey showing people are struggling to cope three years after US-forces overthrew Saddam Hussein. The report on food security and vulnerability in Iraq said almost one child in every 10 aged between six months and five years, suffered acute malnourishment. "Children are major victims of food insecurity," it said, describing the situation as "alarming". 15 per cent of households are classified as "Extremely Poor." A total of four million Iraqis, roughly 15 per cent of the population, were in dire need of humanitarian aid including food, up from 11 per cent in a 2003 report, the survey of more than 20,000 Iraqi households found..."
maritimes.indymedia.org
One in ten; 10%. Just prior to the war, it was ~4% before the sanctions were relaxed it was at a high of ~10%. If I remember the 4% and 10% correctly ... If 50,000 children a year were dying prior to the war due to complications of malnutrition, than there are probably 50,000 children a year dying now. The only difference is that no one cares to argue as to who is at fault.
I'm sure if we did, the argument would be "It's because Bush invaded Iraq. No, it's because of the insurgents. Bush's fault. Insurgents fault....Bush's fault. Insurgents fault....Bush's fault. Insurgents fault....Bush's fault. Insurgents fault....You're a moron....you're a bigger moron...you're a bigger moron...you're a bigger moron...you're a bigger moron...you're a bigger moron...you're a bigger moron. Screw the kids.
jttmab |
