SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elroy who wrote (54490)1/19/2007 7:30:16 PM
From: Solon  Read Replies (1) of 90947
 
"Personally I prefer actions that move more toward putting Iraqis more in charge of their country and Americans less in charge"

Good. Because that is the purpose of the temporary addition of troops: to divide Baghdad into nine segments that may be secured and held. Currently, Iraqis are incapable of controlling the mayhem and taking "charge of their country".

The action of a temporary troop addition appears to be the only workable means to achieve the end that you seek. Withdrawing troops at this time does not put the Iraqui government "in charge". It sets them up for complete and utter failure--and nullifies all the work and all the lives sacrificed.

So the poll response seems utterly thoughtless to me...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext