A US National Health Care System? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (1545)	1/25/2007 1:25:18 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 42652

Let me restate your position for clarity. More like, "let me distort your position for rhetorical purposes". A more accurate way of stating my position, is that government interventions in economic decision making, are generally inefficient and act to impose government control, so its best to limit or eliminate them. Increasing taxes and government regulations increases freedom. I disagree with that position. So do I but it isn't very relevant. Its not entirely irrelevant, getting rid of loopholes does lead to a net tax increase. Ideally it should come together with a reduction of marginal rates. Of course Bush already has reduced marginal rates, but it wasn't at the same exact time, or as part of the same plan as this change.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next