Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: mistermj who wrote (214765)	1/25/2007 3:50:22 PM
From: Garden Rose	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Even with a material breach, that still does not necessitate an invasion, it required that another UN meeting be held under the new resolution 1441 that's why Colin Powell tried "desperately" to rally UN support and it failed. At best, your argument and the USA argument "manipulates" the intent and spirt of UNSC 687. None of the countries signing onto 687 ever expected that the USA was going to unilaterally invade Iraq more than 10 years after the resolution was enacted. Most of the world disagreed, that's why we're in the mess in Iraq, and that's why the world was correct in its decision.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next