SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: LindyBill1/30/2007 5:46:13 AM
  Read Replies (1) of 793895
 

today's papers
Control Office
By Daniel Politi
Posted Tuesday, Jan. 30, 2007, at 5:33 AM ET

The New York Times leads with a look at an executive order issued by President Bush last week that ultimately gives the White House more power to control the rules and guidance documents issued by government agencies. These rules are designed to protect such things as public health and the environment and they have traditionally been the work of career civil servants and experts. But now a presidential appointee will run an office within each agency to supervise their development. The Los Angeles Times leads with a look at how the government has failed to fill several of the largest tunnels discovered on the U.S.-Mexico border. Some are concerned the open tunnels could be reused by those who smuggle drugs or people into the United States.

The Wall Street Journal tops its worldwide newsbox with the first suicide attack in Israel in nine months that killed three people yesterday. Hamas praised the attack and characterized it as an act of legitimate resistance. USA Today leads with its own analysis of preliminary statistics that reveals traffic deaths fell by at least 5 percent in 16 states last year. Despite the preliminary nature of the statistics, some states were quick to say the decreases are a result of better enforcement and programs aimed at educating drivers. The story ends with two experts basically saying the preliminary figures alone are not very significant. The Washington Post leads locally but goes high with new details about the insurgents that were the target of Sunday's day-long battle near Najaf. The fighters were apparently led by a cult leader who claimed to be a revered Shiite Muslim saint that disappeared in the 10th century.

The administration insists the new executive order wasn't directed at any specific agency, but some believe it was issued out of concern for rules and guidance issued by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Occupational Saftey and Health Administration. Naturally, business groups who have to deal with often-costly rules, praised the executive order while others aren't so pleased. Besides having the political appointees in place, the White House also wants to review any new guidance documents it deems significant. "Having lost control of Congress the president is doing what he can to increase his control of the executive branch," an expert tells the paper.

Interestingly, the LAT makes clear that the main entrance and exit points of several tunnels have been closed off, but much of their middle sections are still open, which means smugglers could still use them.

All the papers make sure to point out that the details of Sunday's battle in Iraq are still unclear, although it does appear the group's leader was killed. The militias were apparently heavily armed and they were planning on attacking Shiite leaders and holy sites during the religious holiday of Ashura. Estimates of dead fighters ranged from 150 to 400, and as the LAT makes clear, it's not clear how Iraqi officials came up with these figures. The Post had a correspondent on scene and says women and children were among those the captured.

The LAT sees the group's existence as a sign that "Iraq has become fertile ground for extremists of various stripes" although, as McClatchy emphasizes, it is unclear how a group of this nature got such good equipment and training. The latest revelations are a stark reminder that violence in Iraq can't be quite so neatly summarized as Shiite vs. Sunni.

U.S. and Iraqi officials said the attack showed positive signs that local army and police forces are able to lead an attack, regardless of religious sect. But the NYT reefers word from officials who say there isn't much to celebrate as the battle once again pointed to deficiencies in the Iraqi security forces. The Iraqis were criticized for not noticing that a group of people was gathering in a tightly run compound. Also, it seems Iraqi security forces vastly underestimated the group's strength and U.S. troops had to help with air and ground support. The LAT gives a hint of what might have happened when it says that Iraqi security forces that were sent to investigate came under fire, which seems to demonstrate they had no idea what to expect.

The NYT and LAT front, while the rest go inside with, the latest from the Libby trial. Former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said Libby told him of Valerie Plame's identity over lunch three days before Libby has said he first learned the information. Everyone notes Fleischer is the fifth witness to contradict Libby's version of events. Also damning is the fact that Fleischer also said Libby made it clear he was passing along sensitive information.

Slate's John Dickerson suddenly found himself mentioned in the middle of questioning yesterday when Fleischer mentioned him by name and said he told the reporter that Joe Wilson's wife worked at the CIA. Dickerson doesn't quite remember it that way.

Both the LAT and NYT go inside with separate pieces on how Fleischer's testimony gave an insider's view of the way the White House press secretary is often kept in the dark and then has to deal with changing explanations. "The worst place to stand as press secretary is where the ground is shifting," Fleischer said. The LAT points out that when Fleischer left the White House, he got a letter from Libby: "we will still count on you to come to our rescue whenever the going gets tough."

Everybody fronts the news that Barbaro, the horse that won the Kentucky Derby last May, was euthanized yesterday after eight months of trying to fix extensive damage to his legs. Barbaro's owners decided to euthanize him after they realized there was not much left to do and they felt the horse was going through too much pain. Everyone points out that many who never cared about horse racing were captivated by Barbaro's story. Last year, Slate's Meghan O'Rourke said that "Americans have historically become preoccupied with horseracing in times of national strain" while the Explainer looked into why a broken leg is so dangerous for a horse.
Daniel Politi writes "Today's Papers" for Slate. He can be reached at todayspapers@slate.com.

Article URL: slate.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext