Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: queenleah who wrote (28333)	1/30/2007 4:40:12 PM
From: Honey_Bee	Read Replies (2) of 42834

While claiming that Honey (who with courtesy and obvious friendliness) had made a "demand," her royal WE-highness, makes several "demands" of Honey. But at least her royal issuance answered the question. I would agree with her royalness if she had said that imping someone's real name is immoral. But can she seriously be saying that once a fake ID is used and then disposed of, that it can NEVER be used again by someone new--and that it forever belongs to the original owner? Shirley you jest! :) Would that same principle apply to (if you had one--I don't know) your ex-husband. You wouldn't want him, but you sure as heck wouldn't want fake-number-two wife to have him. LOL! =:) .

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next