SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: neolib who wrote (215870)2/1/2007 4:31:29 PM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
>> I have never claimed that there is anything like an ideal free market. But the US economy is not a bad approximation

You think?! I guess the last creature to acknowledge water is the fish (more on this in my next post). I did a quick search and this is what I found for 2005:

Federal Spending = $T2.6
State & Local Spending = $T1.7
Total Government Spending = $T4.3

Now choose a multiplier for the GDP [see en.wikipedia.org ] This is often belived to be between 5 and 10, but let's be generous and choose 2.5 (i.e half of typical minimum)

Then the effect of government spending on GDP is 2.5*4.3 = $T10.75

Now let's compare that with the US GDP which was $T12.49. In other words, government spending indirectly accounts for at least 85% of the GDP!! That hardly looks like "free market" to me.

Now since this was a just back of the envelope calculation, I know that I have missed something there, so everyone is welcome to do a detailed analysis. Off the top of my head, I can say I did not account for the transfer of payments from the federal government to state and local governments. So some portion was double counted. But then again, I was generous with the multiplier number.

ST
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext