SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 159.42-1.2%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (59650)2/2/2007 3:18:30 PM
From: scratchmyback  Read Replies (3) of 197248
 
<<...my main point is that it appears that the law does not require QUALCOMM to tell a standards setting organization that it has a patent crucial to the adoption of that standard.>>

Even if the law does/did not require Qualcomm or Unocal to be more open in the standards setting process, obviously the standards setting organization and also the other participants feel they have been screwed. Unocal may have won in the court once, but do you think they could do the same trick another time? And can Qualcomm do it again?

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News