Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 159.42

-1.2%

Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rich Bloem who wrote (59695)	2/4/2007 4:12:00 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) of 197271

Thanks for the fly on the wall details Rich. I'm not in the business of believing false things as it's bad for my financial health, so it's good to get to the bottom of why things happen, and happened, and didn't happen, and might not happen. There are plenty of known unknowns, not to mention unknown unknowns. Known knowns seem to be in short supply. Isn't the difficulty mostly in producing the ASICs rather than the phones? <Very few on this board realize how much more difficult CDMA is than TDMA and GSM. > I thought QCOM's aim is to produce backward-compatible, pin-compatible, plug and play ASICs [give or take a bit]. I wonder why the infrastructure division employees were so put out if they were only meant to be starter motor employees, to be turned off or sold down the river once things were up and running. In the reality-based world, trying to make it all make sense, and fit with facts I know to be true. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next