Sultan, that was a very nice speech, conceptually.
It's important to give big-picture views of our destinations and the barriers to getting there. I thought the speech, in an abstract, theoretical way, and through the use of historical anecdotes, did that beautifully.
Unfortunately, understanding the roadblocks to the formation of enlightened, successful democracies may tell us more about why plans to accelerate new democracies will not succeed than it tells us about how to help them succeed.
I say that because many of the "problems" identified as leading to the failure of new democracies are problems that must be remedied through much better education, a higher standard of living, institutional change and cultural change. Understanding that is critical but the speech doesn't address the question of whether there are any methods of markedly accelerating those changes. I don't think there are any ways to markedly accelerate those changes and, in fact, any attempt to do so may create "conservative" resistance and actually impede change.
I saw an interview with the King of Jordon a few years back. He said he was working to bring his country to democracy, and I believed him. According to him, however, his country wasn't ready for democracy. I think he was wise. It's not enough to give democracy any more than it's enough to give a man an airplane. There must be landing strips available, refueling stations and maintenance men. Then you have to teach him to fly it, otherwise you're wasting your time, he's going to crash and no one else is going to want a plane, ever.
I thought the speech did a good job of illustrating that point. It's a far different perspective than the simplistic jargonisms that have been sold to us for decades and that George Bush/Cheney evidently adhere to. I think that's critically important because a democratic government established in a population that's not ready for democracy can be, as we've seen, a very painful experience.
What I'm wondering is why the author of that speech isn't getting some play on public television to educate a lot more people about the fallacy of the "democracy will cure aggression, build better lives and stop terrorism" silliness? We're in critical need of that debate.
I do have an area of disagreement but I'll address that in another post. Ed |
