Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: marcos who wrote (31905)	2/5/2007 8:49:01 AM
From: Mr. Aloha	Read Replies (1) of 78424

CUU is much more advanced. They proved up the enormous Schaft Creek mineralization and did a preliminary assessment (scoping study) over 2 years ago, and could complete their prefeasibility study this quarter. In addition, any dilution they do to advance their project will likely be paid back 4x when Teck exercises their back-in option. It's a much different situation than earlier stage projects. However, because they will need a good amount more dilution before proving feasibility, that and Teck's back-in option need to be factored in when comparing it to more advanced projects. Even after factoring those in, CUU's an incredible value, IMO.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next