SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR)
QLGC 16.070.0%Aug 24 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Craig Stevenson who wrote (10636)10/1/1997 10:54:00 AM
From: nic   of 29386
 
Craig,

I actually saw classes 4 & 5 described in an old Byte article (Feb'97, page 40IS11) - I think I mentioned that when I posted about it back in spring. Here is the relevant section from Byte:

Class 4 provides a simultaneous exchange of data packets between two participants in a network by utilizing several routes so that bandwidth is guaranteed. This service class is particularly beneficial in a fabric where the load changes continuously but connections must have a minimum data transfer rate. In this case, the remaining bandwidth can be used by other applications.

Class 5 service allows for simultaneous (isochronous) data transfer to several participants and is especially applicable for audio and video servers in broadcast mode.

Except for class 1, all classes require a fabric network. Class 4 and 5 specifications are not yet fully fleshed out.


Taking this & your info together, classes 5 & 6 look very similar - maybe they were alternative, incompatible proposals for implementing multicasting, and class 6 won out? I also conclude that class 4 must be providing a circuit that is both fractional and virtual ("several routes").

- nic
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext