SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 206.31+4.1%10:28 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (225641)2/9/2007 12:39:46 PM
From: fastpathguruRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
That's not true. Bigger caches and everything that takes advantage of it makes a lot of sense in 4S systems as well. Think about it; the processors can spend less time accessing the memory if more of their working sets fit in their caches.

Agreed... Especially when bandwidth between sockets/chipset is lacking.

There is a quad-FSB chipset coming out from Intel which will support Tigerton, Intel's direct response to Barcelona. Sure, it's not cheap (in terms of cost and power), but just like the multi-chip module concept, it's a pretty good stop-gap measure until Intel finally gets rid of the FSB.

Fair enough, although cost is going to hurt bad, I think... High MB complexity, high R&D, very low volumes. Someone has to eat that cost. What's the memory bandwidth of the Quad FSB chipset?

fpg
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext