Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dayuhan who wrote (218118)	2/13/2007 9:12:47 AM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) of 281500

It may also be to their advantage to calculate how many cuts the US will take before cutting back. And I don't think that Iran wants to see Iraq descend into chaos. There are already enough refugees going into Iran, they don't want anymore. Everyone is playing an unpredictable balancing act. Do you really think the Bush admin wants to bomb Iran? It may not be his first choice, but Bush's position is either Iran will capitulate or he'll take out the nuclear facilities. A game of chicken is at play. The decision to send more troops into Baghdad and Anbar says that Bush still believes that military power will eventually prevail. Plus, who's got the balls to take us to court? Can't impeach the guy for using his authority as Commander in Chief. Just in his recent CSPAN interview, he again cited Truman as one of his fav Presidents. Read: Eventually history will recognize Bush to be the great visionary and President that he is. jttmab

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next