SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Katelew who wrote (218645)2/15/2007 5:54:25 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (3) of 281500
 
Please let me know when the Democrats eliminate the AMT now that they have both houses of Congress. I understand they want to make sure Bush's tax cuts of a few years ago expire? Will that raise your taxes do you think?

I don't remember Republicans trying to kill the mortgage deduction. But a little research shows a tax reform commission in 2005 did recommend replacing it with a 15% tax credit. The proposal went nowhere. And the same panel recommended killing the AMT.

Here's an informative blog post:

Tax-panel Will Consider Changing Mortgage Interest Deduction
This surprises me. I didn't think mortgage interest and the capital gains provision on the sale of a home would be on the tax reform table. But when the deficit problem is this big, and the projected changes in the alternative minimum tax open up an additional $1.2 trillion dollar budget gap, a $61.5 billion dollar deduction is a tempting source of revenue:

Tax Panel to Consider Modifying Mortgage-Interest Deduction, by David Streitfeld, LA Times: ...[D]ebate is starting among policymakers about reining in one of the most sacred cows of American public policy: the mortgage-interest deduction and other generous tax benefits granted to homeowners. A presidential commission on tax reform will take up the subject for the first time Tuesday. "Everything's on the table," said Charles Rossotti, a panel member... The mortgage-interest deduction saved homeowners $61.5 billion last year. No one expects the commission to recommend its elimination. Instead, the panel probably will consider scaling back the deduction for mortgage interest on second homes or home equity loans, and changing the deduction for property taxes, among other things. The stakes in such a discussion are huge. Changing the tax benefits for homeowners, even if done slowly, could cause short-term convulsions in the market as buyers recalculate what they could afford. ... Any proposed shift will encounter strong and possibly overwhelming resistance. But with a rising budget deficit, the prospects for change are much greater than they've ever been, say those involved in the debate. ... Eight years ago, capital gains taxes were eliminated for sellers who had profits of as much as $250,000 (for individuals) or $500,000 (for couples). ... Some policymakers and analysts are beginning to wonder whether such breaks are providing the wrong incentives, giving hefty deductions to millionaires buying Beverly Hills estates as well as to speculators snapping up Las Vegas ranch houses hoping to turn a quick profit... Bush specifically charged the panel to take account of "the importance of homeownership and charity in American society." That led many to conclude that the homeowner deductions were safe. ... But ... the mood changed over the summer. ... One reason for the shift: the expected demise of the alternative minimum tax. ... At a meeting in July, the nine panel members agreed unanimously to recommend eliminating the alternative minimum tax as an unfair and poorly designed parallel tax system. Because their mandate is to be revenue-neutral, that required them to come up with $1.2 trillion in other receipts over the next decade...

Posted by Mark Thoma on October 8, 2005

economistsview.typepad.com

Here's a proposal from a Berkeley prof who definitely did want to "crush the mortgage interest deduction" as he put it:
delong.typepad.com

Maybe he was a Republican? At Berkeley? Hah. No, turns out he worked in the Clinton adm.

Here's a leftwing 2004 blog post claiming Bush would eliminate the mortgage interest deduction. He didn't of course. Maybe this is something that you might have read and remembered partially:
documenting-democracy.org

So, my quicky research shows a Bush tax commission recommending altering the mortgage deduction and killing the AMT. Neither happened.

OTOH, I find a Democratic economist who surely does want to "crush" that mortgage deduction.

Hmm.

----------
One last thing:

Some of the capping proposals would raise 70 billion and would hit the 'richer' classes harder and tend to spare the mid and lower classes.


Please don't buy this if the Democrats or anyone else say they want to do this. It will be the first step to losing the mortgage deduction. Whenever you read someone wants to only tax the rich but spare the middle class, its a lie. The middle class will ultimately be targeted.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext