SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: heinz442/19/2007 9:04:16 PM
  Read Replies (1) of 78417
 
Innovation and rare earth research are increasing rapidly in China. Mr. Fifarek describes the rare earth research center at Baotou as “an innovative environment that is growing.” There are 1000-2000 dedicated scientists researching rare earths, and a large body of research is being provided by Chinese sources. There are 3 or 4 university centers in China devoted to the study of rare earths. These measures are all designed to keep China at the forefront of REE production, materials, technology, and innovation. As the study states, “As manufacturing moves overseas, it is inevitable that both engineering work and R&D will follow.”

The Chinese have rapidly accelerated their number of rare earth patents. This shift may become even more dramatic as China further restricts the outflow of its resources. As it is, non-Chinese firms are now faced with ever-increasing pressure to relocate closer to the Chinese REE resource. Compared to the US, China is gaining a clear advantage in the pace of developing patented technology. As there is no strategy in the US to reverse this process, we may assume that this trend will continue and possibly accelerate. The implications for future innovation may be both surprising and potentially devastating for the US and other industrialized nations.


The US may continue to lose ground if we don’t re-spark a national focus on rare earth technology. The study reveals that universities may discontinue research on technology that experiences a decreased interest by local firms because of offshoring.

The prime example of this in the US is the loss of Iowa State’s Rare-earth Information Center (RIC), which closed in 2002 due to a shift in funding from rare earths to pig research. This is an excellent illustration of the difference between US and Chinese strategies. The US does not have a clearly-defined national initiative to guide the study of rare earth – so regional institutions such as Iowa State are forced to transfer funds to research more directly related to their local economy (pork). This is not to say that US funds are not directed toward rare earth research—there are government grants given to universities to study various rare earth uses—but there is no comprehensive or guiding plan.


A vivid example of the power shift in the REE industry can be found in the magnet industry. The US played a critical role in the discovery and development of rare earth magnets starting in 1966 with SmCO5 magnets. General Electric, Bell Labs, Raytheon, and General Motors were among the key companies developing this technology. In 1983 NdFeB magnets were introduced as a cheaper and more powerful solution for the magnet industry. The new NdFeB magnets were rapidly accepted by the marketplace. Magnequench was formed in the 1980s by GM to take full advantage of the new technology. In 2000 Magnequench completed construction of a research park in North Carolina. However, in that same year it also opened a plant in China. By 2004, Magnequench closed all of its US facilities and moved operations to China and Singapore.

The study further reinforces the decline of US influence in the fast-growing rare earth magnet industry:

“Informal conversations with one firm representative revealed that removing manufacturing from the US has also led to the removal of over 90% of domestic R&D activities on rare-earth permanent magnet materials. More importantly, the knowledge for producing NdFeB magnets within the US has been lost. US based manufacturers can no longer compete with the quality of NdFeB magnets produced in China or Japan.”

The REE magnet industry is slated to grow at over 12% per annum through 2010, with China being best-positioned to benefit from this growth.


When I asked Mr. Fifarek what has surprised him most in his study of rare earths he replied, “The fact that no one is really looking at this issue of how offshoring affects innovation”. We take for granted that jobs will be lost overseas. The discovery of new REE resources in China was bound to increase competition in the rare earth industry. But it seems that the US has been caught completely flat-footed in regards to the transfer of innovation overseas in one of the future’s most important areas of technological development. Indeed, there is very little awareness of the problem or its severity.

In the last fifteen years there has been a power shift from a US-dominated REE industry to a Chinese dominated one. This supremacy now extends to most of the vertical market—from production to innovation to end product.


All is not lost, but the US must initiate a clear plan to gain and retain a technological edge in the research and development of REE. When I spoke with Mr. Veloso (one of the study’s co-authors), he stressed that all is not “doom and gloom” with US research in REE. While the magnet industry has left the US, others—such as catalysts—have stayed. Mr. Veloso stated that we must “reinforce specialized research” regarding rare earths, as there are still areas that we can lead.

The US must identify strategic areas of rare earth innovation and provide funding to the firms and universities that can do the research. We need a comprehensive strategy to guide the development of the next generation of rare earth technology.

For over a decade, China has had an unambiguous policy in place to dominate the rare earth industry. The US needs to recognize its loss of innovation and develop a strategic plan of its own.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext