THE WHITE HOUSE Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE

SPY 689.46

-0.9%

4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ichy Smith who wrote (598)	2/20/2007 1:46:51 PM
From: Steve Lokness	Read Replies (2) of 25737

Iran and iraq are inconsequential in the longer timeline. If you want to beat china you have to educate people to become engineers and scientists and researchers and not social workers. You have to demand excellence from teachers and lower welfare rates until those on welfare go back to work. The US doesn't have the intestinal fortitude to do that. The US has the intestinal fortitude to invade Iraq - but not educate? That is silly, if our leader had placed his aim and efforts into education instead of Iraq, there is little he couldn't have accomplished. I don't have the low opinion of America that you do. Iraq and Iran are NOT inconsequential. Do you have any concept how much could have been accomplished if the money spent on Iraq had instead been spent on education?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next