Bush is against an enemy which you, I recall, have acknowledged is horribly awful, unless I miss my memory fails me. Yet you feel Bush is more harmful than that enemy. Did I just say Bush is against an awful enemy which you are against too? Ask yourself how far wrong can someone who is against our appropriate enemy (i.e. al qaeda and general Islamic extremism. Yes, we have some agreement here, I'm sure) can really go, even in Iraq?
Truly, you have moved beyond pessimism into the realm of negative imaginings where there is no way out for America, despite the existence of an accurately identified enemy. If the identification of an appropriate danger lurking in Iraq were truly incorrect, we would not be facing an enemy committing suicide bombings and beheadings today (but of course we are).
No way out for America thanks to Bush you say? Truly, only the likes of you can make it so, and you are obviously foolishly trying to make it so. To say that Bush is the "number one" enemy of America is ludicrous you see, but you've said it. Bush can be in many ways a poor if still forceful and determined President in his opposition to Islamic religious extremism & Jihad (he's too religious as it is for my liking, so kudos to him for his strong stand against fanaticism of a far darker kind than he'll ever come close to feeling himself), but your notion of him as our worst enemy is truly beyond the reasonable thought upon which America was founded.
Dan B. |
