SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Advanced Micro Devices - Off Topic
AMD 243.98+4.5%Nov 10 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joe NYC who wrote (816)2/22/2007 2:56:36 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) of 1141
 
Joe, > Switching the entire electric power generation away from burning carbon and hydrocarbon to nuclear would have an impact. And from there, you can move on to heating, and later on, making hydrogen for propulsion.

a) Nuclear power has its own problems, namely with security. In this age of terrorism where the free world is unwilling to fix the problem at its source, nuclear power plants will have to be guarded more fiercely than other types of power plants.

b) What's cheaper than directly burning natural gas for heating?

c) The production of hydrogen has to be powered by existing power plants, since hydrogen itself isn't the source of energy, but merely a medium to transport and store the energy.

Hence the folly of trying to replace fossil fuels with the existing alternatives simply because of global warming. People have already forgotten just how wonderful fossil fuels are as a source of energy. Sure, it can lead to excesses, just like anything else that helps propel an industrialized world. But the reality is that there isn't anything much better, at least not until we figure out cold fusion.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext