Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: epicure who wrote (221372)	2/27/2007 2:29:40 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) of 281500

Maybe someone hasn't done an estimate because it wasn't all that bloody a takeover. If it had been super violent, you'd figure (or I would figure, at least) that there'd be a lot more written on it, right? Those 500,000 boat people had nowhere to go - the US only took in smaller numbers from the first wave, most wound up in refugee camps for years, some were forcibly repatriated to Vietnam. The journey was a desperate one, many died at sea, since the pirates were thick as the sharks. People don't run like that for no reason. Especially when they know they can't come back and have no safe haven in view. I've heard lots of people point to how many people are fleeing Iraq. But that's a relatively safe journey and they have where to go in Jordan. It's just a matter of not wanting to look at certain history.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next