Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 50.58

+4.8%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: exhon2004 who wrote (3007)	8/21/1996 8:59:00 AM
From: Shibumi	of 186894

Sounds better than neutral to me. Grove > (Gill + Aymer) by a mile. A bit more seriously, I read of a study several weeks ago that did a statistical correlation on insider trading and stock movement -- what this study did was focus on the type of insider was doing the trading. Perhaps unsurprisingly, those that sat on the board on a regular basis did much better trading than those corporate officers who didn't. As a former corporate officer of two companies (in neither position did I sit on the board, but in one of the positions I was a full 16B officer) this rang true to me. There's too much going on in a corporation of any size (I was in a $8B and $500M revenue company) to understand the dynamics of stock movement without being privy to what is being planned at the board level. One other note, which I'm sure everyone is tired of hearing by now -- but all things being relatively equal, it says a lot more for an insider to buy than to sell. Selling is a way of life for any insider -- your financial advisor is going to be all over your tail to diversify since you're apt to have well over 90% of your potential net worth tied up in the company. Buying is a much bigger deal. Mark

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next